Jobsworth by Michael Scutt » discrimination

Seven Ways for Employers to Avoid Stress at Work Claims

Michael Scutt — Tue, 19 Jan 2010 10:00:45 +0000

Yesterday Ian Barratt of Mind Strengths Ltd published his “Seven Top Stress Management Tips for Employees”. Today I am publishing my “top tips” for employers hoping to avoid claims for stress at work from being commenced against them.

First, some background. Stress at work is a complex and wide-ranging subject, touching on many aspects of employment and personal injury law. The claims will arise either under the law of personal injury (in negligence) or under the Protection from Harassment Act 1997 (PHA) or, alternatively for constructive dismissal and/or discrimination. All four could be raised in the same instance, although it is not possible for an employee to sue in negligence and unfair dismissal unless the circumstances leading to the injury are independent of the facts relating to the dismissal. Although many employers may feel “under siege” from all the rights that employees have, they should note that the law is not kindly disposed towards employees in this area: stress at work claims are difficult and expensive for employees to pursue successfully.

No employer can be immune from ever finding themselves facing a claim from an employee, but following the tips below ought to reduce the risk of a claim arising or, if one does, of being successful. There are many legal aspects to allegations of “stress at work” and care needs to be taken when an employee asserts that the employer has, in some way, caused him/her to become unwell. Most allegations will state either that the employer has overloaded the employee with work or not provided enough support/resource to do the job properly or that a line manager has bullied/harassed/victimised the employee.

It is also not uncommon for employees to claim that they are suffering from “stress” when they fall into dispute with their employers or disciplinary/performance management processes are commenced against them.

How to mitigate the risk of these claims arising?

1. Adopt best practice

The Health & Safety Executive publishes a great deal of information on the subject. In particular it has devised “Management Standards” which “define the characteristics, or culture, of an organisation where the risks from work related stress are being effectively managed and controlled. … The Management Standards cover six key areas of work design that, if not properly managed, are associated with poor health and well-being, lower productivity and increased sickness absence.” There are six management standards covering demands; control, support, relationships, role and change. The TUC and ACAS also publish useful materials on stress at work.

2. Be aware.

Carry out risk assessments of the roles your employees are expected to undertake and the workplace in which the role is to be carried out. This is not only integral to the HSE’s Management Standards but is a statutory requirement under the Health and Safety at Work Act 1974 (HSWA) and the Management of Health and Safety At Work Regulations 1999 (MHSW). The HSWA applies to any employer with more than five employees and require “a written statement of his general policy with regard to health and safety at work of his employees”. The MHSW requires a risk assessment “for the purpose of identifying the measures he needs to take to comply with” his particular statutory duties. Breach of this requirement can make an employer liable at civil law. However, a greater incentive for compliance is that an employer who does carry out a proper risk assessment is going to be better positioned to defeat a claim for stress at work than one who does not because the risk assessment process should uncover any obvious factors potentially giving rise to stress. An employer will only be liable in negligence if his breach of duty of care to the employee was reasonably foreseeable.

Take action before it is too late

3. Have a stress policy and adhere to it

This might include providing employees with access to a counselling service or a telephone helpline. The courts look favourably on employers who do so, but the provision of such facilities won’t be enough on its own to rebut liability.

4. Act fairly and consistently

Stress claims can arise from incidents of bullying/harassment and victimisation. Put in place policies promoting equality in the workplace – and enforce them. Claims for discrimination can arise, apart from any other considerations over stress and there is no maximum cap for compensation unlike with unfair dismissal claims. We see many claims where the situation has been caused by fellow employees displaying completely inappropriate behaviour in the workplace, or line managers being “over-zealous” in trying to fulfil their roles. Ensure that line managers manage fairly and in a “human” fashion. An employee suffering bullying at work from other colleagues or line managers may be able to bring a claim under the PHA for “distress” caused.

5. Contracts of employment (1)

Ensure that you have the contractual right (either in the contract of employment or the contractually binding section of the Employee Handbook) to require the employee to attend a doctor for the purpose of a medical report. This can be a useful tool if the employee is off sick for any length of time because it means you can get a medical report from an independent expert rather than relying solely on the letters from the employee’s GP, who will often be very keen to be (too) supportive of the employee.

6. Contracts of employment (2)

They should be drafted so that any entitlement to full sick pay (as opposed to statutory sick pay (SSP)) is in the discretion of the employer or, preferably, full sick pay will not be paid if an employee goes on sick leave immediately after having been asked to attend a disciplinary or performance management meeting. Employees tend to become well again once they are not being paid. SSP is payable in most cases (click here for main terms) for 28 weeks at the rate of £79.15. Click here for more details on SSP. Amending employees’ contracts of employment can be a complicated process, fraught with challenges of its own. Please seek legal advice before deciding to do so.

7. Act decisively

If a stress at work problem looks like it might be rearing its ugly head, don’t ignore it. Take legal advice as soon as possible.

Related posts: Coming Soon … Miserable Monday

If you are an employer or employee and need advice on your situation please contact me on 0207 464 8433 or at michaelscutt@dalelangley.co.uk.

None of the above material (or anything published anywhere on this blog by me or anyone else) constitutes legal advice to you. You should not rely on it and if you need legal advice about your situation you should take specific legal advice on your own situation. I am always happy to provide legal advice via Dale Langley & Co.

Seven Ways for Employers to Avoid Stress at Work Claims originally appeared on Jobsworth by Michael Scutt on 19/01/2010.

Seven Top Stress Management Tips for Employees

Michael Scutt — Mon, 18 Jan 2010 10:20:35 +0000

As promised last Monday, I am delighted today to welcome my first guest blogger, Ian Barratt (pictured, right) of Mind Strengths Ltd, to present his Seven Top Stress Management Tips on this third Monday of January, the allegedly most miserable day of the year. Ian is a qualified stress management consultant speaker and author. His book “The Phoenix Strategy”, co-authored with Amanda Robinson was published last October. Mind Strengths Ltd is a consultancy company offering workplace strress management , wellbeing and support services. Tomorrow I will look at how employers can minimise the risk of being sued for stress at work by employees.

Today, Ian focusses on how employees can manage stress.

1. Identify and write down your major stressors

By taking time to find out what is causing you stress, you will be taking a big pro-active step towards managing your problem areas. Start by writing these down, no matter how trivial they may seem. Then, focus on the top 2 or 3 that cause you the most stress impact and work on a plan to deal with these one at a time. Never try to fix all the problems at once or in an unrealistic timescale. You should also now be able to let go of the trivial stressors as these are not so important.

2. Establish some goals and objectives

It can be very satisfying to set some personal goals and objectives to help you kick start the New Year. Make these meaningful and achievable as there is little point in setting personal goals that you either get bored with or you cannot accomplish. Make sure that you set your goals over short, medium and long term timescales to keep you fully focussed throughout 2010.

3. Develop a Personal Relaxation Plan

A relaxation programme can be as simple as deciding to walk more, to perhaps joining a gym. Even if you take exercise for just 20 minutes a day, this will help your physical and mental wellbeing. An often overlooked benefit of exercising is that our brains release endorphins, which have as “feel good” effect and gives us feelings of euphoria. If a more mundane relaxation programme is your choice of escape, try meditation, yoga or pilates – all of which will teach you a range of breathing exercises that are critical to relieving and beating stress.

4. Give yourself some thinking time

We all need some down time occasionally where we can think more clearly about circumstances and events that may be causing our stress levels to rise. Setting time aside to think about these problems will help you to rationalise what is occurring and provide some clarity to help you move forward. If this proves difficult, step outside yourself and look back in as an outsider. You may find this makes things easier as you are viewing the problems from the outside as a third party. Ask yourself “what would I do if I were advising someone else?”

5. Be positive

Many stress related problems can be made worse by low confidence and lack of self-esteem. When you are down and depressed, any issue, no matter how big or small, can have a negative effect on the way you feel. Having low self-esteem generally means that you have negative thoughts about the outcome of a particular situation, event or about yourself. Learn to convert any negative thoughts into positive thoughts and positive energy. Write down any problem areas and you will find that the whole situation becomes less threatening on paper. Change your thinking from “I can’t do” to “I will be able to do.”

6. Practice good time management

Time management isn’t for everyone but even when you can apply some of the theory, you will see noticeable differences in the way you run your life and it will help you reduce stress. For example, making a list of your tasks at work is a great start but not very useful if you don’t know how long each task will take, so remember to do this too. Also, prioritise tasks and ensure that you have a clear picture of what you will be doing today and each day of the working week – and stick to your plan!

7. Keep a Stress Diary

The Stress Diary is a fantastic way to keep track of what may be causing you stress and will help you identify any patterns that may be occurring. To make this a meaningful exercise, you should keep the diary for a minimum of 2 weeks as this will enable you to see any trends. Make a note of anything that causes you stress on a scale of 1-10 (10 being high) but only keep scores of 6 and above. Discard the rest as they should be minor stressors – you need to focus solely on the major stressors. You may find some of the findings surprising! Finally, work on a plan to eradicate the problem areas.

The Seven Top Stress Tips have been compiled by Ian Barratt, founder director of Mind Strengths Ltd. Ian is a qualified stress management consultant, author and speaker, who specialises in identifying and managing stress and improving wellbeing at both a corporate and individual level.

For further information, please contact Ian on +44 (0)1634 314090 or via email at ian.barratt@mindstrengths.co.uk. The website contains some additional useful information and can be found at www.mindstrengths.co.uk.

Seven Top Stress Management Tips for Employees originally appeared on Jobsworth by Michael Scutt on 18/01/2010.

Climate change can be a philosophical belief

Michael Scutt — Wed, 04 Nov 2009 15:14:20 +0000

The case of Grainger PLC v Nicholson UKEAT/0219/09/ZT gained lots of media coverage, including the front page of today’s The Independent (“Green beliefs win legal protection”). I covered the case when it was before the Employment Tribunal and Mr Nicholson initially won. The Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) has rejected the company’s appeal and held that Mr Nicholson’s belief in climate change is capable of qualifying as a philosophical belief within the meaning of the Employment Equality (Religion or Belief) Regulations 2003. These regulations protect workers with religious or philosophical beliefs from being discriminated against because of their religion or belief. This was a preliminary hearing on whether belief in climate change could qualify within the meaning of those Regulations. Mr Nicholson still needs to return to the ET for the case on its facts to be decided. That will include cross-examination of his beliefs to establish to what extent they govern his life.

It is predicted that this decision will lead to employees being able to claim that they have been discriminated against on the ground of any spurious or loony belief that they might have or pretend to hold. Undoubtedly employers are going to face some interesting assertions of belief over time. To assist in considering what factors should be taken into account when considering the nature of the asserted belief, the EAT set out some guidelines for deciding whether a “philosophical belief” should qualify;

The belief must be genuinely held
It must be a belief and not an opinion or viewpoint based on current information
It must be a belief as to a weight and substantial aspect of human life and behaviour
It must attain a certain level of cogency, seriousness, cohesion and importance
It must be worthy of respect in a democratic society, be not incompatible with human dignity and not conflict with the fundamental rights of others

The judgment notes that political beliefs could qualify for protection and, given the furore over Nick Griffin’s recent appearance on BBC’s Question Time and subsequent media concern that the BNP is on the rise, it is interesting to consider whether a member of the BNP who is dismissed from his/her job because of support for the BNP could qualify under these Regulations for protection. This was raised in Grainger and the Court pointed to (5) above as the limitation which should prevent “racist or homophobic political philosophy” from gaining protection. On the face of it, therefore, the hypothetical BNP member would not be able to claim under these Regulations. This is, of course, a fairly new area of law and that particular issue has not yet been tested.

Please contact me with any comments or details of any other cases that take this point further, or if you simply need advice on your own position. I can be contacted on 0207 464 8433 or via email at michaelscutt@dalelangley.co.uk

Climate change can be a philosophical belief originally appeared on Jobsworth by Michael Scutt on 04/11/2009.

Race Discrimination and Redundancy

michaelscutt — Fri, 05 Jun 2009 16:06:43 +0000

Two recent cases before the Suffolk ET highlighted the risks that employer face when making redundancies. In this particular matter, Obikwu v British Refugee Council and Ukwaja v British Refugee Council (BRC), two (black) immigration workers were selected for redundancy by their employer, the BRC. The ET found in favour of both workers in April 2008, but it was only in the last few days that Mr Obikwu’s remedies hearing took place which settled the level of compensation to be paid to him. Ms Ukwaja’s case was determined last January.

They both worked at the Oakington immigration centre in Cambridge. Plans were announced to close it in May 2006 but were subsequently suspended. However five months after the decision to close it was put on hold both of the claimants were made redundant. Their departure removed the only two non-white employees from the staff at the building. Not surprisingly, both brought claims for unfair dismissal and race discrimination.

How did this situation arise? The ET held that the manager in charge of selecting candidates for redundancy, one Anne-Marie Leech, had “subconsciously” favoured colleagues with whom she was friendly. The Claimants alleged that she was “consciously biased” against them (although the ET rejected that allegation), which was probably not surprising because Ms Leech hosted a party at her house (to which the two Claimants were not invited) and none of those people who did attend were selected for redundancy. It’s not clear from the newpaper reports whether Mr Obikwu and Ms Ukwaja were the only employees made redundant, or just the only two ethnic minority employees amongst a wider cohort. The ET Chairman noted that white workers with less experience were selected to remain in employment over the two Claimants. In the circumstances it is not surprising that they both won.

There are two legal issues raised in this case. One concerns the need for employers to have fair and reasonable (and objective) selection criteria when choosing which employees to select for redundancy. If an employer fails to make an objective choice then the affected employee may have a claim for unfair dismissal (if they have more than 12 months continuous employment experience at the date of termination). The maximum compensation that an ET can award for unfair dismissal is capped at £66,200 plus a basic award of £350 per year of service. However, and this is the second legal issue raised in this particular case, if the employer selects an employee for redundancy on grounds of their race, colour, nationality or ethnic or national origin that will amount to an automatically unfair dismissal. An employee who believes they have been discriminated against on grounds of their race will probably be advised to bring a claim under the Race Relations Act 1976 for compensation because, unlike the compensatory award for unfair dismissal under the Employment Rights Act (ERA), that award is not capped. That can lead to a very substantial award being made, because the ET can also award compensation for injury to feelings, as well as loss of earnings and other financial losses. There is also no 12 month qualifying period required under RRA claims. The employee cannot claim compensation under the RRA and a compensatory award under the ERA.

Mr Obikwu was awarded £65,475 for unfair dismissal, racial discrimination, psychiatric injury and loss of earnings. I haven’t seen how the award was broken down so it is hard to say what value the ET put on each head of claim. However, in the case of Ms. Ukwaja, she was apparently awarded £30,000, which comprised £15,000 for injury to feelings due to racial discrimination, £8,349 for unfair dismissal, £5,000 for discrimination and £2,643 for interest on lost earnings.

From a legal point of view there was nothing particularly noteworthy about these cases. What caught the eye of the media though was the fact of a charity involved with refugees unfairly dismissing and racially discriminating against two ethnic minority staff: the BRC deserved to be censured for that. However, not everyone might agree with that: I found one report of the cases on The Independent’s website and read some of the comments that followed the report. Sadly, some of the respondents saw this story as an example of “another utterly baseless thought crime! Another opportunity to redistribute monies to chosen victim groups, taken with relish” and “It’s a bit naughty taking a charity to court, surely the funds raised by the Refugee Council would be better spent on helping everyone in [the] developing world move to Europe than on handouts to disgruntled employees”. No, actually. The anti-discrimination laws exist for a reason; no employer is exempt. The whole episode leaves a nasty taste in the mouth.

Race Discrimination and Redundancy originally appeared on Jobsworth by Michael Scutt on 05/06/2009.

The new Equality Bill

michaelscutt — Tue, 28 Apr 2009 19:49:23 +0000

This is something we will be hearing a lot more about over the next few months and years. At last the government has introduced legislation that seeks to rationalise the current miasma of anti-discrimination legislation and bring it all into one piece of legislation.

At the moment, in the workplace environment, six types of discrimination are outlawed – age, race, sex (gender), sexual orientation, religious belief and disability. Each piece of legislation behind each type is different in certain respects so a new Act that contains all the relevant definitions, duties and defences is to be welcomed. Whether, in practice, the Equality Act (if it gets that far) will be is another matter. Undoubtedly it will change as it goes through Parliament but here are the current headlines

1. The Secretary of State will be given power to order employers with more than 25o employees to publish information about male and female pay levels, with a view to thus highlighting discrepancies in pay between the sexes. This won’t be enforced for at least the next four years though.

2. Secrecy clauses in employment contracts forbidding staff discussing their pay and bonuses (what’s a bonus?) will be outlawed.

3. Associative discrimination will be made illegal. This means that, as in a recent case, a carer of a disabled person is dismissed because of her caring obligations, she will be able to claim disability discrimination even though she is not herself disabled.

4. There will be new definitions of indirect discrimination and disability discrimination.

5. Positive discrimination at recruitment in favour of disadvanteged groups will be allowed when the candidates are otherwise equally matched.

6. Public bodies also have duties imposed upon them to promote equality.

The Bill has been mooted for some time now and it will be interesting to see how much survives the scrutiny of Parliament, especially at a time when the economy is in deep recession. Many employers, no doubt, will not relish having additional burdens placed upon them by government.

The new Equality Bill originally appeared on Jobsworth by Michael Scutt on 28/04/2009.

Redundancy – know your rights!

michaelscutt — Sat, 06 Dec 2008 23:27:48 +0000

Judging from the traffic on this site, redundancy is the big employment law issue at the moment and not surprisingly given the current climate. 1,000 job losses announced this week at Nomura, 650 at Credit Suisse and that on top of the losses at Goldman Sachs and Lehman Brothers. In my day job I am seeing plenty of people from investment banks and beyond, all with concerns and queries about either being told they’ve been selected for redundancy or are at risk. If you’re one of those people what do you need to know?

1. Are you an employee? Most employment protection legislation (apart from that involving discrimination issues) only covers employees and not self-employed people, for instance.

2. How long have you been continuously employed by your employer? To be able to claim a redundancy payment you need two years continuous employment experience. If you have this then you are entitled to be paid a “statutory redundancy payment” (SRP) in addition to your notice monies. SRP is not generous – £330 per complete year of service if you’re between 22-41 and £495 if you’re over 41. Your notice entitlement will be as set out in your contract of employment or as stipulated by the Employment Rights Act 1996 – basically 1 week per year of service up to a maximum of twelve weeks (four weeks notice minimum to be given by the employer once the employee has one month’s service).

3. If you have more than one year’s continuous employment experience then you have acquired the right not to be unfairly dismissed. This is a big topic but, in brief, it may allow you to argue that your selection for redundancy was unfair.

4. Have you been discriminated against? There are six main grounds for discrimination – race, sex, age, disability, religious belief and sexual orientation in addition to other grouds such as being subject to less favourable treatment because of being a fixed time or part-time worker. In addition whistleblowing is another type of claim that might be available. Remember it is your role that needs to be redundant, not you. What will happen to the work you do once you’ve left?

5. Most of the employees I see have been given a compromise agreement by their employer and they need an independent solicitor to advise them on their legal rights under the agreement. I have written elsewhere in this blog on compromise agreements and the issues they raise – see the page headed “compromise agreements” on the tab at the head of this blog for more information. One main reason why employers offer compromise agreements is that they want the employee to waive their rights to sue for unfair dismissal, discrimination, breach of contract etc. This is particularly the case if the employer is offering an enhanced package (in the City this is often, but not always, one month’s full pay per year of service).

6. If you have been given a compromise agreement then you will need to have it reviewed by a solicitor; give me a call if you want me to help. If you are unhappy about your selection or want further advice, get to see a solicitor and get some advice.

7. It is always helpful when seeing a new client to see the contract of employment, all correspondence relating to the redundancy situation and, of course, the compromise agreement.

Please call me on 0207 464 8433 or email me at michaelscutt@dalelangley.co.uk if I can help you at all.

Redundancy – know your rights! originally appeared on Jobsworth by Michael Scutt on 06/12/2008.